ISBA 2.0 - Reboot

If a "rereboot" will make people happy I'm fine with it.

YEEEEEEEAHHHHH REREBOOT!

(just want cap/roster situation cleared up imo)

i don't know man, another restart? it won't change anything imo

^u need to use a different team besides GSW. That's gotta be boring by now. Use the 76ers.

It would change my roster. Yours too crax (nate)

That's all you should care about imo

Yeah Crax...take Philly and trade for Nate. Or use GSW and you'll have Nate for league minimum salary.

I'm open to a reboot. I honestly don't care. I just enjoy the OA atmosphere. Plus it would open the gates for more trading and #fantasyTeam talk to begin again. Always entertaining.

Steve Nash left me high and dry with his retirement announcement anyway. I've traded away the 3 best prospects in my organization and all I have left is an aging Stephen Jackson.

Well I'm up for a rerererereboot as I said earlier this week. Even though I'm in love with my team as it is now.

^you should be in love. It's a fabulous team. Especially once you get rid of some of the trash like Mike Bibby or World Peace.

#twintowers

Yeah I say rereboot after playoffs or even now lol

I don't even think we'd need trade restrictions too because people have seen how dumb some of those trades were

Yeah if we restart I'm using another team, philla or wolves or some other shit team. Prolly go 10-48 or smthn, but whatever....

I want to wait until after the playoffs. We've invested too much. Plus the playoffs will start this weekend or early next week if my calculations are correct.

If others want a rereboot and than go for it.

I'm in love with thunders regular roster. Just need a couple moves & I got my dream team

Yep, that was the plan, though Metta is not such trash as everone makes him I noticed that D stats are really important, just standing besides someone not even contesting with someone like metta disrupts the shot. And he is a very decent 3 pt shooter.

Though it would be intriguing to start over with an underdog and try to make it a contender in a couple of years ... but it seems that there will always be a reason for a reboot. I don't have anyone specific in mind but there is always disatisfaction from any of us that in the end results in this.

we wait till nba2k.com and roster updates, then restart imo

There's no way you can make a non contender, a real contender because of how awful this games AI is. Everyone just stick to the same teams and restart

^I would love to have a player like Metta...He could be an impact player for the right team. I just notice from your box scores he seems to be the odd man out most games.

Yes, I don't think you'd have 2-3 years to build someone up. You don't need that long anyway IMO. One or two trades can make a dramatic difference.

We'll see what others think. I'm good either way whether we reboot or not. Ante was against it last week. Not sure what he'll think now that he's in the gutter with NOLA.

That was a low blow crax...

I'd enjoy a rereboot. #fantasy coming back is entertaining. Now that it's over, it's just retarded

Bryan wrote:

^I would love to have a player like Metta...He could be an impact player for the right team. I just notice from your box scores he seems to be the odd man out most games.

Yes, I don't think you'd have 2-3 years to build someone up. You don't need that long anyway IMO. One or two trades can make a dramatic difference.

We'll see what others think. I'm good either way whether we reboot or not. Ante was against it last week. Not sure what he'll think now that he's in the gutter with NOLA.

That was a low blow crax...

Well everyone was against it and I could see why, since we all would love to develop some kind of story with a team. But I can see also why one would want to reboot it though. What I'd like is just some more communication on gameplay instead of just being offensive after a bad game (same goes for me). I'd love to hear from people what was cheap etc. so one could correct it ... Whenever I go for a triangle spin in the post now the face of Lebron wagging his finger pops into my mind now ...

are you guys serious?
#areyouseriousbro?
I wasnt serious when I said #rereboot, it was just like last 35 times I said it. But seriously, if we can workout some kind of a tweaked trade process or sth, and get new teams/players why the heck not.
Its not like there are more than 5 of us in playoffs anyways and this season had a lot of downs, etc.
So this season would be treated like a regular online league and a new start would be for real?
Btw. I dont think nba2k.com will ever launch its OA tab

(i edited my posts from last page, it was just that i was a bit disappointed in crax because we always had great games and this wasnt one of those. Look i didnt even insult you and called names, you know i love you)

Edit: maybe we should use better teams as these suck and cpu thunders, clippers of this 2k world are killing us

If dexy want our hometown sixers i would love pacers or blazers or maybe even hornets

#rereboot

I would love an 82 games (more user games) season though and 8 or 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 mins quarters.

As for nba2k OA association Ronnie2k tweeted a week ago that is soon to be ready, whatever that means in their vocabulary.

2k Ronnie said back in November that when the lockout ended everything there would work. I hope they pay him well because he's a complete shill for 2k.

#maybe2k13

Yes bounce exactly. Take the good teams too. I'm reserving thunder now lol

82 games seems interesting but idk anything so...

I think 58g/8min would be optimal. These 7min games suck, with a min longer scores would be more often in 60s and 70s. Top players could average easily 20 and bench players would matter more.

Regarding trades, cpu veto yes, human human no, but limit to 3 trader or sth, maybe that you cant change more that lets say 5 or 6 players from your default roster in one season.
That would give some flexibility but not too much.
Maybe also that a traded player cant be traded again unless thats a pre-arranged 3 team trade.

yup Leroy it would be much more interesting if each conf. would have 5-6 instead of 2-3 players in playoffs. That can't be reached if we are still only Hornets, Bucks and Wizards. But lets say we are Clippers, Blazers and Thunder then there's a huge chance that at least 2 of these 3 will be in top 8.