ISBA 2.0 - Reboot

Start reserving teams?

Vince: Cavs
Paul: Lakers
Ante: Hornets
Bryan: Raptors
Goldie: Warriors
Justin: Celtics
Bounce: Bucks
KIA: Spurs
Luka: Jazz
Codin: Knicks
KJ: Grizzlies
Simon: Pacers
Kong: Blazers
Steelersack: Hawks
Leroy: Wizards
Reese: Clippers
Mulac: Magic
Jeebs: Thunder
Pacers32: Bobcats

ISBA 2.0 Reboot
All-Star difficulty
7 minutes/quarter
58 games
Respect your opponents/other members
Play fair (don't abuse exploits)
Still have to get CPU trades approved(even if 2K said they patched it, doubt it)
USER - USER trades don't need approval



ISBA Reboot
pw: nohsux

Raptors for me.

I hope EDC and Hrvoje join for 2.0

lets wait till all the rookies are signed and trades done etc.

^I agree. It should be good timing honestly because the patch should be out within 10 days and the real life rosters should be settled by then too.

They said that they cant add Owner options or Sliders so its gonna be the same crap.

I dont see Jeebs listed above, why not?

Goldielox wrote:

lets wait till all the rookies are signed and trades done etc.

oh yeah of course we won't start til everything is settled in

Bounce wrote:

They said that they cant add Owner options or Sliders so its gonna be the same crap.

I dont see Jeebs listed above, why not?

I only listed the ones I've seen post the past 2-3 weeks so yeah lol, except Simon but that's because the league is dead

Bounce wrote:

I dont see Jeebs listed above, why not?

Not having owner options or sliders blow but to combat that I'm going to play less CPU games this time around. Those contributed to a lot of my frustration. The user v user games are OK (not as good as 2k11 IMO) so I'll focus on those and the GM aspects of OA.

If Lakers don't get D12 and/or CP3 and have pretty much the same roster, give me Clippers.

So just put Los Angeles next to my name until the Lakers roster is finalized

Love to, solution:

29 games fast advancements = less cpu games, also less human games, but less simmed games because you have TONS of time

If Hornets change their roster and even they don't have Paul or something I'll play with them, if the roster stays the same I'll use another team.

The f'd up Nuggets or NOH.

I was hoping to finaly get the Knicks, since that is my team and I never managed to get them in association and its better to play with a team u actually care for, but now I will have to think which other team I fancy.

count me in

^^team?

Ante wrote:

Love to, solution:

29 games fast advancements = less cpu games, also less human games, but less simmed games because you have TONS of time

El-Divin-Codin wrote:

I was hoping to finaly get the Knicks, since that is my team and I never managed to get them in association and its better to play with a team u actually care for, but now I will have to think which other team I fancy.

Well Justin hasn't come in and really reserved the team....I was assuming for everybody. You were the first one to say you want the Knicks

That's fair right? Codin gets NYK?

Yes

Ante wrote:

Love to, solution:

29 games fast advancements = less cpu games, also less human games, but less simmed games because you have TONS of time

I'm OK with this but this could be too slow moving. 6-7 weeks to play 15-17 user games. I'll do whatever others want on this.

What about quarter length? Are we sticking with 8 or is 7 mins on the table for discussion?

As for EDC taking the Knicks. Obviously I don't care one way or another since I don't have a dog in the fight but isn't it assumed Justin takes the Knicks? That's how I always interpreted it.

8 imo

It's free for all for teams as usual. I don't know. If Justin wants to give them up, then whatevers. I don't care either lol

Do you think the 29 game schedule is smart or 58? I wonder because it takes the same amount of real time to get through each season length on the 6 hour advances (about 6-7 weeks) but with 58 you get more user vs user game possibilities. You have more CPU games though, which is a big drawback. I guess the thing you have to ask yourself is do you care about piling on extra losses to the cpu for the opportunity to play more user games or are you content playing 10-13 user games in a 6 week span and doing a lot of waiting around.

29 games = less cpu games = less stress = no quiting = fun


Did I made myself clear?

We can make em on pro since they're really playable on pro, I play my player on pro simulation/default it's really nice...

But since y'all won't agree we'll keep it on all star smh...

Here we go again with the pro bull crap. you suggested this before and everyone disagreed... Why bring it up again?

Idk about 29 games. Thats probably 1 or 2 games a week. That seems like A LOT of waiting around. But it's up to you guys.

Id say 58 games and medium or slow speed since it was obviously very difficult to get your PO games in even if you are probably one of the most active in the league.

LETS WAIT FOR A PATCH BEFORE DECIDING FELLOWS
it's pointless making decisions atm

That is true as well, the patch and finished rosters.

Would love it if CP3 went to the Clippers and Howard to the Nets. That's two teams more that will be competitive in the league.